United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 68 F.3d 1451 (1995) Facts. (defendant) is a Delaware corporation wholly owned by Eastman Kodak, Inc. (Kodak) (defendant). Atex produces keyboards. The plaintiffs sued Atex and Kodak, arguing that Atex’s keyboards caused repetitive stress injuries.

A video case brief of Hammer v. L293d motor driver circuit diagram pdf. Dagenhart, 247 U.S. Read the full-text case brief at In 1916, in response to increasing concerns over child labor conditions in mills and factories, Congress passed the Keating-Owen Act which prohibited goods made by children under a certain age from being sold in interstate commerce. Dagenhart (plaintiff) brought suit on behalf of himself and his two sons, who were minor children employed in a cotton mill in North Carolina, against Hammer (defendant), a United States attorney, alleging that the Act was an unconstitutional exercise of Congress’s Commerce Clause Power. The District Court for the Western District of North Carolina held that Congress acted unconstitutionally in attempting to regulate a purely local matter.

Both Hammer and the United States appealed to the United States Supreme Court.